← All Educational Resources

2026–27 · Main lesson · Fall 2026

29

Compare Model Filters and Plan for Safe Water

Adult extension of: Water Filter: Water in an Emergency

October 5–8, 2026 · planning reference

Build two small filtration models and compare how they change visible particles. Use the results to distinguish a useful demonstration from an actual safe-drinking-water plan.

Curriculum skill focus: Size discrimination, sequencing, cause and effect, comparing visible change, water safety

01 · Learning

Objectives

  • Compare two filter arrangements using the same test-water volume.
  • Separate observable clarity from untested safety claims.
  • Identify a trusted source of drinking water during an advisory.

02 · Preparation

Materials

Two stable funnels in stands; clear shatter-resistant cups; clean gravel and rinsed sand; coffee filters; clean tap water mixed with a little clean soil for demonstration only; measuring cup; tray; timer; labels; towels; local water-advisory example. Facilitator prepares any cut containers before the session.

03 · Practice

Adult project

  1. 1

    Label every cup and the source jug DEMONSTRATION ONLY — DO NOT DRINK. Agree on observation, pouring, timing, or recording roles and place everything in a spill tray.

  2. 2

    Choose a comparison: the same amounts of sand and gravel in a different order, or paper alone versus paper plus media. Write or select a prediction and identify the single difference.

  3. 3

    Use the same mixed test-water volume for each filter. Pour slowly; record passage time and compare the collected samples against a white background without tasting or smelling them closely.

  4. 4

    Record visible particles, color, and flow in words, marks, photographs of the setup, or a partner-supported chart. Repeat if practical, remixing the source before each equal portion.

  5. 5

    Decide what the test cannot show: clarity does not establish removal of germs or dissolved chemicals. Review an official advisory and identify bottled water or the treatment specifically directed by local officials.

  6. 6

    Create a three-part decision card: check the advisory, use an approved supply, and ask for help when uncertain. Dispose of demonstration water appropriately, clean the station, and wash hands.

Evidence & interpretation

What the investigation shows

Filtration can separate some suspended particles by size. This model neither measures pathogens nor tests dissolved contamination, so its appearance is not a safety test.

Practical connection

Why this work matters

This investigation builds consumer judgment, fair testing, practical recordkeeping, and emergency planning. The useful outcome is knowing when a filter claim needs stronger evidence.

Participation by choice

Individual access options

  • Choose a dry role such as timer, label reader, or evidence reviewer; watching is full participation.
  • Use a funnel clamp, lightweight measuring cup, seated-height tray, and partner pouring if desired.
  • Offer large-print or picture choices for clearer / similar / more particles, with speech, pointing, writing, or AAC responses.

Review & transfer

Reflect on the work

  • What evidence would you need before calling water safe to drink?
  • Which instruction on a real water advisory would change your usual routine?

Topic references

Lesson finder ↑ Support This Work ↗